Re: The util-linux reorganisation
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > - merge mount and bsdutils in util-linux
> > All three packages are essential and I don't see a reason why they
> > should be in separate binary packages.
> > I think I need for the transition empty packages of mount and bsdutils
> > (because they are currently essential).
> You don't need transition packges, look into the package-disappearing
> trick from dpkg.
Could you point me to some documentation that describes this trick? I must
admit that I still don't understand it.
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.