Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
phil@bolthole.com writes:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:45:55AM +0000, Philip Blundell wrote:
> > ....
> > I think ARM is okay at the moment; almost all the packages that are unbuilt have
> > actually failed, so human intervention is what's needed rather than machine
> > cycles.
>
>
> Funnily enough... right now, my package has failed build on ARM, and from
> what I've been told, it's a problem with the autobuilder, not with my source.
> [Its not picking up debhelper automatically as a build-depend]
Err, no, PEBKAC. debhelper is not Build-Essential, if your package
needs it, you need to specify it as a build dependency.
--
James
Reply to: