Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 00:31:31 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010309003130.B1307@alcor.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0103082120370.4687-100000@cornerstone.core.aoi>; from vulture@aoi.dyndns.org on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:21:03PM -0800
References: <[🔎] 20010308215746.C4255@harmony.cs.rit.edu> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0103082120370.4687-100000@cornerstone.core.aoi>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:21:03PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:

> Binary incompatibility and missing shared libraries don't create segfaults.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

In what universe do you live?

-- 
 - mdz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
  - From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>

References:
- Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
  - From: D-Man <dsh8290@rit.edu>
- Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
  - From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
Next by Date: Re: ITP: Galeon -- Mozilla-based web browser with GNOME look and feel
Previous by thread: Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
Next by thread: Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread