Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Philip Blundell wrote:
> I think ARM is okay at the moment; almost all the packages that are unbuilt have
> actually failed, so human intervention is what's needed rather than machine
> cycles. Alpha looks like maybe it could benefit from an autobuilder, and I do
> actually have a spare machine here that I could use for that if it would be
> useful.
Ivan Moore is setting up an autobuilder for Alpha, IIRC. I'm also working
on getting one going.
C
Reply to: