Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
Date: 08 Mar 2001 08:15:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 874rx4n333.fsf@hacking.dk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010307230306.M24675@visi.net> (Ben Collins's message of "Wed, 7 Mar 2001 23:03:06 -0500")
References: <[🔎] 20010308000138.H4097@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20010307222311.I24675@visi.net> <[🔎] 20010307214621.A3689@x8b4e531b.dhcp.okstate.edu> <[🔎] 20010307230306.M24675@visi.net>

Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:

> There is an i386 buildd. Not sure of it's status.

Not that I have researched the x86 buildd status but last time I heard
about it, it was closed. I can't imagine that we havn't the hardware
available so I guess that we x86 users simply is unaware of the
problems.

It's probally mostly a problem with manpower to check the build
repports.


-- 
Free beer får det bedste frem i en pingvin.
http://peter.makholm.net/beer/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
  - From: cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)

References:
- Autobuilders - do we need more?
  - From: Steve McIntyre <stevem@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
- Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
  - From: David Starner <dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org>
- Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Possibility of packaging JDK 1.3?
Next by Date: Re: portability as a goal for debian?
Previous by thread: Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
Next by thread: Re: Autobuilders - do we need more?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread