Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 03:22:48PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> Logically, if it's been reported 10 times within 24 hours, it means that
> 100 or so people found their system unsuitable (I've found that only about
> 10% of the people who find bugs report them, precisely because of abuse
> like this) within the same amount of time, and hundreds more will do so
> before your fix gets out of incoming. That you'd release a broken package
> is one thing, but the fact that you responded abusively and publicly to a
> bug report sickens me. Is this the type of person that should be DPL?
I'd personally like to know exactly what your involvement is with the
project, besides making abrasive posts to the mailing lists.
Also, I think you'd enjoy a slightly higher level of credibility among the
readers of this list if you could leave the pseudonym(s) at the door.
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>