Re: serious bugs because of missing build depends
On 20010225T225104+1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> When the MUST/SHOULD/MAY stuff was proposed, all the stuff in policy
> was gone through and adjusted to have the correct meaning under the
> new interpretation.
Hm, seems so. A must was demoted to should. My mistake, sorry.
Anyway, it seems that packaging manual was not, as the now united policy
manual says SHOULD in one point (from old policy) and MAY in another
(from old packaging manual).
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % email@example.com % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%