[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bad upload - report bug against ftp.debian.org, severity?



On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:32:59PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Yesterday I accidentally uploaded an elvis-tiny package to
> master with 'Distribution: stable unstable' and 'Urgency: high'.
> I corrected that today with a new version that just went
> to unstable with urgency=low, but ofcourse the bad version
> needs to be removed from the archive.

Bad packages uploaded to stable end up in proposed-updates and
(theoretically) get rejected by the release manager when he eventually
gets round to making a point release.

Bad packages uploaded to unstable get replaced, not removed: after all,
people may have update to them, and if the package was bad, they'll need
to upgrade, which they'll only do if a package with a later version is
uploaded. (Which, it seems, you've done)

You're welcome to file a bug (against ftp.debian.org) about the stable
upload if you like; prefix it with [POTATO] (or add a "potato" tag)
to make sure it's noticed.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpArT_ReCI1D.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: