Re: ITP: lynx-cur -- lynx of current development version
On 13 Feb 2001, Peter Makholm wrote:
>Atsuhito Kohda <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Well-known lynx but this is of current developement version.
>I still don't think we should package more than one version of each
>program for Debian. Libraries has special depency reasons to have in
>more versions but for ordinary programs I don't see this need.
I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own
Who is John Galt? email@example.com