[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[MAILER-DAEMON@cs.rmit.edu.au: Returned mail: Can't create output]



Hi,

The BTS received this bounce, and another one just like it. Something should
be done to fix this up...

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@cs.rmit.edu.au> -----

Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 04:48:32 +0100
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:48:21 +1100 (EST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@cs.rmit.edu.au>
To: <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Returned mail: Can't create output
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)

The original message was received at Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:48:14 +1100 (EST)
from wombat.cs.rmit.edu.au [131.170.24.41]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<tiknoll@bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 <tiknoll@bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au>... Can't create output

Reporting-MTA: dns; bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au
Received-From-MTA: DNS; wombat.cs.rmit.edu.au
Arrival-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:48:14 +1100 (EST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; <tiknoll@bilby.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Action: failed
Status: 5.3.0
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:48:21 +1100 (EST)

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: pfaffben@msu.edu
Cc: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@pilot.msu.edu>(autoconf #84251),
        Timshel Knoll <timshel@debian.org>(parted #84251)
Subject: Processed: Re: Actually an autoconf problem
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:48:07 -0600

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 84251 autoconf
Bug#84251: parted: cannot build from source; also missing build-depend
Bug reassigned from package `parted' to `autoconf'.

> severity 84251 fixed
Bug#84251: parted: cannot build from source; also missing build-depend
Severity set to `fixed'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)





----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification



Reply to: