[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package Reorganisations



On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On related note, why is it so unreasonable to expect the buildd people to
> keep their build systems synced with the current stable as a minimum, and
> with current unstable if they're building packages for unstable...

Not everyone builds X4 before they build random binaries that use xpm...

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpk6qcZz0Cvb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: