[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: autobuilders

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:44:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
>     Anthony> (At the moment source only uploads don't work, the
>     Anthony> autobuilders may or may not be able to correctly
>     Anthony> determine when a source only upload needs to be built,
>     Anthony> the i386 autobuilder probably couldn't cope, only finding
>     Anthony> out that your package doesn't build at all a day after
>     Anthony> you upload it is probably fairly awkward...)
> Why do the autobuilders require a binary package for some architecture
> in order to determine if it needs to be built or not?

I'm not sure if this is the case, it's merely my recollection from last
time I looked (quite some time ago now).


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgpPUMATBLWMZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: