[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: [RFC] Making NM 'by recommendation']

>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:

 Santiago> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 >> Any developer can NMU a package if there is need [...]

 Santiago> This is only true for .deb packages.

 Santiago> Bugs in certain packages may only be fixed by privileged developers,
 Santiago> and they may remain unfixed for a very long time, which is not good.

	Calling something which does not have a .deb a package is a
 misnomer (despite the fact that we have extended the BTS to cover non
 packages). These entities may be important sub systems and processes
 in Debian, but they are not packages. 

	For packages, my statement stands.

 A beer delayed is a beer denied.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: