[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#83419: where are libssl09 and libssl095a?



On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:13:33AM -0800 , Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Now, since the MAJOR and MINOR numbers are both used in the soname, one could
> presume that libssl09, libssl095a, and libssl096 could all be installed
> simultaneously. However, libssl09 and libssl095a have been obsoleted and have

yes. they can. I even have all of them installed

> been removed from sid EVEN THOUGH there are packages that still depend on them.

he? it's normal. don't you know that? whena a package stops to build a .deb
the old gets removed. With testing in place this shouldn't happen anymore
though. So you must either upload openssl-0.9 and build libssl09 and
openssl-0.95a and openssl-0.95 to build libssl095 and libssl095a. UGLY

				Petr Cech
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
           cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz

<Tv> We are debian.org, resistance is futile, you will be apt-get upgraded.



Reply to: