Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server
(this is not directed specifically at anyone)
I don't quite get this... This list is moderated. Is it not too much for
the moderator to moderate these postings and/or the user instead of
drawing hte hounds just because one guy things a bug should be in a
Some logical discussion, or perhaps some without the interspersement of
flames, would be a fresh change.
I have a hard time finding the logic in wasting your time complaing about
how your time is being wasted. What does this solve?
Erik Hollensbe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Programmer, Powells Internet Division
"I respect a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he is wrong."
- Malcolm X
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 08:56:41PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > > You have the gall to quote private email on a public list, and
> > > expect people to accord you any attention whatsoever? Have you ever
> > > heard of nettiquette?
> > There is nothing personal in my reply and neither in quoted text and
> Um, there is. The thing that caused you to say "Great kiss ass" to hmh.
> > What happens is that I've got a real-world problem but I am being told of
> > the complex-es of the maintainer of that package.
> > Then, the guys who like him come in and tell me things that do not interest
> > me at all... Are you guys on crack?
> Oh, of course. It's just you who is not, isn't it obvious? :>