Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Indeed, you should feel lucky that even the non standard
> PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP is provided by the
> implementation, even though not present in ISO/IEC 9945-1
Yep, I know what NP means. My trouble was something else but I
had thought that it was due to the symbol I told of being undefined.
When I was doing it I was writing c++ wrappers for a large portion
of the pthread lib, so if I can recall it correctly this time I guess
the trouble was that I could not initialize error checking mutexes
and had to resort to the basic ones... Are all three types of mutexes
supported under glibc? According to the info manual it should be but...?
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara