Re: Important Note On Source-Only Uploads
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Basically: don't do them.
Gack. I know several people have counted on this working in the past.
Moreover, it's really a *good* thing, if you don't have a lot of control
over your build environment. Let the autobuilders do it.
> The most important problem this has is how katie (the new dinstall)
> processes it. It goes through the following motions:
> * check source's md5sums etc
> * install source into archive
> * add source to sid
> * notice source has no binaries in any suite
> * remove source
Bug in katie, yes?
> Another significant problem with source-only uploads is that (afaik,
> anyway) none of the autobuilders will attempt to build any arch: all
> packages, which would have left both the source only uploads I've noticed
> recently to break anyway.
Hm maybe we need an autobuilder that does arch-all then?
see shy jo