Re: xdm not pamified?

[Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> writes:

    Joseph> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 08:19:29PM +0200, Roderich Schupp
    Joseph> wrote:
    >> > The xdm in X3 can't be PAMified since that mean either really
    >> bad PAM > support or breaking binary compatibility iirc.
    >> 
    >> I guess wdm (PAMified drop-in replacement for xdm with
    >> WindowMaker GUI) is in the really-bad-PAM category then?

    Joseph> Oh yeah, it uses Red Hat's broken xdm pam..  A new wdm
    Joseph> should be built based on the new xdm's pamification code
    Joseph> for a proper fix.

I'm using wdm (1.19-4.2) and it uses PAM just fine...
-- 
Delta Force security bomb AK-47 colonel [Hello to all my fans in
domestic surveillance] Ft. Bragg NORAD KGB killed critical pits
assassination World Trade Center attack
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]