Re: On Bugs
On 02-Oct-2000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 08:15:48AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> The problem is that our definition of release critical is flawed.
>> A package should only hold up the release process if it has
>> an important (or higher severity) bug report, and the package itself
>> is important.
>
> This is largely what happens anyway, though, no?
>
during potato release, it seemed like packages of low importance (extra) were
dealt with like they were in standard or higher. gedit was the one that I
remember clearly.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On Bugs
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References:
- Re: On Bugs
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>