Re: On Bugs
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:32:05AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Why should a grave bug on gedit hold up a release? With the number of packages
> we have, ensuring that the tiny "My first program" pieces of software are bug
> free is nearly impossible. perhaps we should limit the scope of release
> critical bugs to packages with priority standard or lower?
The problem is that our definition of release critical is flawed.
A package should only hold up the release process if it has
an important (or higher severity) bug report, and the package itself
is important.
A grave bug in an extra priority package is no big deal for
the overall release; the package should just be removed
from the frozen archive. The release should never wait on
such a package.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On Bugs
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References:
- RE: On Bugs
- From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shaleh@valinux.com>