Re: Locales in new libc: eeew!
Previously Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> What!! An hexdump? Is someone insane? The SUSv2 standard (Unix98) allows
> using the characters themselves... why would we want something like this?
Unicode perhaps?
Wichert.
--
________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: