On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:34:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > gpg: CRC error; 72a653 - dc372a > > gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been used > > This concerns me a lot more than the joke itself or what led up to it. > > Does anyone else have this problem with that mail? You don't have to be > able to decrypt the message to see if the ASCII armoring has been borked. i had copied and pasted (gpm on console) the text into gpg and recieved no error except that i lacked the necessary private key to decrypt the message. i have mutt set to autoverify signatures, it verified your signature fine, and displayed the encrypted block as the message text (mutt ignored it) > If mutt is hosing up my mails I'm gonna be mondo pissed. If my MTA > (postfix) or murphy's MTA (still qmail?) is hosing up my mails I'm gonna be > mondo pissed. i am using mutt 1.0.1-9, postfix, fetchmail and procmail for the entire mail setup. > In fact, I'm gonna be mondo pissed no matter whose bug this is, let's try > and track it down. When I discovered that fetchmail was mangling GPG mails > a year or so ago, I had a thrombosis about it. maybe he was using one of those broken MUAs that don't understand RFC 2015? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpWkhFXAI3HP.pgp
Description: PGP signature