Re: Bug#68661: Should not remove pager's alternative on upgrade
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 10:42:36AM +0200, Robert Luberda wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> > Or do you think that update-alternatives should not overwrite your manual
> > changes?
>
> Yes. And you should not remove alternative in less's prerm script to
> give update-alternatives a chance to save my settings.
I see, ok, I changed that.
> But there is another problem: update-alternatives resets link for
> pager to the best alternative even when w3m is upgraded and alternative
> `pager -> w3m' is removed. I think this is a bug in update-alternatives,
I'll wait a few days and if noone objects I'll assign this bug to dpkg.
Thomas
--
1024D/B0FA4F49: FA38 2D7E 408F 61E4 BF49 B48F 04BD F5BE B0FA 4F49
2048g/C631AF6E: B89D 7BF4 AA6B 569B D9D1 4BF6 3459 66AB C631 AF6E
Reply to: