[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: test -d /usr/man && mail submit@bugs



Hi.

In <[🔎] 20001229015036.A28242@silly.cloud.net.au>,
  on Fri, 29 Dec 2000 01:50:36 +1100,
    on Re: test -d /usr/man && mail submit@bugs,
 Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
> > I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
> > On this box, there are...
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > ...several packages that install stuff in /usr/man .  Do these warrant bug 
> > reports?
> 
> Yep, IMHO. We should be FHS compliant by now, there's been plenty of time.

The CTTE recommendation, or DPL order, was that the woody has
the symlinks from /usr/man/<pakcage> to /usr/share/man/<package>, IIRC.

Is this changed now ? Can we drop the postinst/prerm requirements
to create/remove those symlinks ?

-- 
  Taketoshi Sano: <sano@debian.org>,<sano@debian.or.jp>,<kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>



Reply to: