Bug#80434: marked as done (sndconfig)
Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 14:53:05 -0500
with message-id <20001224145305.A31076@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#80434: sndconfig
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2000 19:37:55 +0000
>From philven@pacbell.net Sun Dec 24 13:37:55 2000
Return-path: <philven@pacbell.net>
Received: from adsl-63-198-207-140.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (localhost.localdomain) [63.198.207.140]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14AGxu-0007Tu-00; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:37:54 -0600
Received: (from root@localhost)
by localhost.localdomain (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBOJHgG08035;
Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:17:42 -0800
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:17:42 -0800
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200012241917.eBOJHgG08035@localhost.localdomain>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: Philip Venable <philven@pacbell.net>
Subject: sndconfig
X-Mailer: bug-buddy 1.0
X-BadReturnPath: root@localhost.localdomain rewritten as philven@pacbell.net
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: general
Severity: normal
Version:
Synopsis: sndconfig
Class: sw-bug
Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)
System: Linux 2.2.16-22 i586 unknown
Description:
I used sndconfig to configure my Sound Blaster 16 pnp sound card. The
tests worked fine, but when I try to play sound files all I get is
static. I ran sndconfig a second time with the same results.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80434-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2000 19:52:35 +0000
>From knghtbrd@tank.debian.net Sun Dec 24 13:52:35 2000
Return-path: <knghtbrd@tank.debian.net>
Received: from cc659474-a.indnpls1.in.home.com (trinity) [24.22.127.210]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14AHC6-00087i-00; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:52:35 -0600
Received: by trinity (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4F89B139C4; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 14:53:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 14:53:05 -0500
From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
To: Philip Venable <philven@pacbell.net>
Cc: 80434-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#80434: sndconfig
Message-ID: <20001224145305.A31076@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 200012241917.eBOJHgG08035@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200012241917.eBOJHgG08035@localhost.localdomain>; from philven@pacbell.net on Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:17:42AM -0800
X-Operating-System: Linux trinity 2.2.18pre15
X-No-Junk-Mail: Spam will solicit a hostile reaction, at the very least.
Sender: knghtbrd@tank.debian.net
Delivered-To: 80434-done@bugs.debian.org
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please learn to use your bug reporting tools. You sent this bug to
Debian, not to Red Hat.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:17:42AM -0800, Philip Venable wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
> Version: =20
> Synopsis: sndconfig
> Class: sw-bug
>=20
> Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)
> System: Linux 2.2.16-22 i586 unknown
--=20
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Free software developer
<Culus> dhd: R you part of the secret debian overstructure?
<dhd> no. there is no secret debian overstructure.
<CosmicRay> although, now that somebody brought it up, let's start one
:-)
<Knghtbrd> CosmicRay - why not, sounds like a fun way to spend the
afternoon =3DD
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: 1024D/DCF9DAB3 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
iEYEARECAAYFAjpGVCEACgkQj/fXo9z52rPFNQCfTo5MiGkc+LNm3LS78ueW5vAL
A/cAn3zaNts5PqJvyJHBbEmGcktH17es
=snWy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR--
Reply to: