Bug#79950: updating to potato from Linux2.0.34( i believe it was hamm)

To: basic <basic@Op.Net>, 79950@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Bug#79950: updating to potato from Linux2.0.34( i believe it was hamm)
From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 14:10:48 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001223140033.A9600@minnesota.bauerschmidt.eu.org>
Reply-to: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>, 79950@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20001220062139.A263@stan.stan>; from basic@Op.Net on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:21:39AM -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1001220114443.29615A-100000@panic.et.tudelft.nl> <[🔎] 20001220062139.A263@stan.stan>

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:21:39AM -0500, basic wrote:
> subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2

Is your RAM ok? How much RAM do you have? Do you have a swap partition?

Roland

-- 
Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#79950: updating to potato from Linux2.0.34( i believe it was hamm)
  - From: basic <basic@Op.Net>

Prev by Date: Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in
Next by Date: Re: looking for replacement for run (because of critical bug in
Previous by thread: Bug#79950: updating to potato from Linux2.0.34( i believe it was hamm)
Next by thread: Re: Problem building a package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread