Re: LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:25:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20001214172540.B18802@cistron.nl>
Mail-followup-to: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20001213174808.A4322@silk.kitenet.net>; from joeyh@debian.org on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 05:48:08PM -0800
References: <E1461Ip-0002Rc-00@flower.cesarb> <20001212221146.V30962@visi.net> <[🔎] 20001213174808.A4322@silk.kitenet.net>

Previously Joey Hess wrote:
> Ah, LFS support. Are you planning to enable it by default in glibc? I
> understand there might be some kind of performance hit?

You need to read the VA lists better :). The performance hit is
really minimal.

Wichert.

-- 
   ________________________________________________________________
 / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience  \
| wichert@cistron.nl                  http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

References:
- LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)
Next by Date: Re: ITP: fspanel - a minimilist panel to replace Gnome's and KDE's
Previous by thread: LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)
Next by thread: Re: LFS (Re: Bug#79490: test11 is bad; this package should be removed ASAP)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread