[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT!] Replacing hacked binaries

On 2000-12-02 04:21, Chad Miller wrote:
>Having seemingly badmouthed this proposal, let me say I support it.
>Checksums _are_ useful if one thinks that on a trusted system, the
>packaging is borken by some (e.g.) ex-slackware admin.  It's poison,

I've just had my root system moderately corrupted.  I had to boot from 
another file system to run the fsck.  I could really use some sort of 
checksum method to make sure that my files aren't corrupt or missing.

It was particularly unfortunate that my kernel started panicing while dselect 
was installing packages...

http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/     Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/       Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/     My home page

Reply to: