Hi! I recently took over maintanance of wdm, and working through some old bugs, I found some issues I think not aply to wdm only. * alternatives vs. conflicts (bugs #64966, #50707, #64967) Right now, wdm, kdm, xdm and gdm mutually conflict (more or less). IMO, it would be nicer if [xwgk]dm would provide a virtual package `display-manager'. * Since [xwgk]dm all use less or more the same config (at least, as far as the server (which server on which vt) is concerned). Shouldn't it be a good idea to let them share this config? This would make changing display manager (and wdm's postinst scripts) somewhat easier. -- Kind regards, +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce | |--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi | | zoetekw@phys.uu.nl | bon le faire? | | bas@A-Es2.uu.nl | Pablo Picasso | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
Attachment:
pgpZCFmOhz5b5.pgp
Description: PGP signature