Re: kernel with supermount
Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
> However, I must agree that more or less every major distribution except us
> supplies a rather heavily patched kernel. In truth, the reason not to
> patch our kernel is more in that maintaining our patches is a PITA with
> the current source packages and that dbs is no substitute for a modern
> source package format. =p
Maybe that would be your reason.. I actually like running a kernel
with as few patches as possible. It makes it a lot easier for me
to track down where occasional problems come from.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: