Re: kernel depends?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: kernel depends?
- From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:59:17 +1100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20001202155917.A9965@silly.cloud.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20001130151720.U2262@ipe.uni-stuttgart.de>; from nils@ipe.uni-stuttgart.de on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:17:20PM +0100
- References: <GGEHKABFDJFBFANEJFEBGECHCGAA.reaper@TGR.yi.org> <20001128125535.B4771@murphy.nl> <E140kSX-000800-00@riva.ucam.org> <20001129081853.B27318@silly.cloud.net.au> <20001129092328.B2954@python.linuxsolutions.com.br> <20001129185650.A573@TGR.yi.org> <20001201000703.A2370@silly.cloud.net.au> <20001130151720.U2262@ipe.uni-stuttgart.de>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> What is wrong with the proposition to make it depend on the virtual
> kernel-assembler and let gas provide that on all other architectures,
> but bin86 on i386?
That sounds like a good solution. Should we file wishlist bugs requesting it?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: