Bug#66442: marked as done ()
Your message dated Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
with message-id <20001202011322.A32181@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Closing spurious bug-buddy reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2000 08:04:08 +0000
>From root@localhost Wed Jun 28 03:04:08 2000
Return-path: <root@localhost>
Received: from (localhost) [212.73.71.156] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 137CpJ-0002mp-00; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 03:04:06 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA00810;
Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:03:09 -0400
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:03:09 -0400
Message-Id: <200006252303.TAA00810@localhost.localdomain>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: root <root@localhost>
Subject:
X-Mailer: bug-buddy 0.7
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: general
Severity: normal
Version:
>Synopsis:
>Class: sw-bug
Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
System: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686 unknown
Debugging information:
(no debugging symbols found)...Core was generated by `linuxconf'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x80c8606 in DIALOG::editterm ()
#0 0x80c8606 in DIALOG::editterm ()
#1 0x80c4688 in DIALOG::edit ()
#2 0x80c22cf in DIALOG::editmenu ()
#3 0x80c0fbd in DIALOG_RECORDS::editmenu ()
#4 0x80c1068 in DIALOG_LISTE::editmenu ()
#5 0x80bbb6d in M_DIALOG_LISTE::editmenu ()
#6 0x402d23ab in ppprh_edit ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/redhatppp.so.1.17.2
#7 0x402d2f18 in MODULE_redhatppp::domenu ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/redhatppp.so.1.17.2
#8 0x80b44bf in module_domenu ()
#9 0x8084377 in netconf_status ()
#10 0x80cb303 in uithread ()
#11 0x8084780 in netconf_edit ()
#12 0x8070601 in linuxconf_editctrl ()
#13 0x80cb303 in uithread ()
#14 0x8070989 in linuxconf_mainmenu ()
#15 0x8070a66 in linuxconf_main ()
#16 0x402f7b7f in treemenu_jump ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/treemenu.so.1.17.2
#17 0x402f8980 in treemenu_maintext ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/treemenu.so.1.17.2
#18 0x402f8bbd in treemenu_main ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/treemenu.so.1.17.2
#19 0x402f8cbe in MODULE_treemenu::message ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/treemenu.so.1.17.2
#20 0x80b46aa in module_sendmessage ()
#21 0x8070a52 in linuxconf_main ()
#22 0x806f025 in main ()
#23 0x400fb9cb in __libc_start_main (main=0x806e40c <main>, argc=1,
argv=0xbffffb94, init=0x806d520 <_init>, fini=0x80d20a0 <_fini>,
rtld_fini=0x4000ae60 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbffffb8c)
at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:92
#0 0x80c8606 in DIALOG::editterm ()
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x80c4688 in DIALOG::edit ()
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x80c22cf in DIALOG::editmenu ()
No symbol table info available.
#3 0x80c0fbd in DIALOG_RECORDS::editmenu ()
No symbol table info available.
#4 0x80c1068 in DIALOG_LISTE::editmenu ()
No symbol table info available.
#5 0x80bbb6d in M_DIALOG_LISTE::editmenu ()
No symbol table info available.
#6 0x402d23ab in ppprh_edit ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/redhatppp.so.1.17.2
No symbol table info available.
#7 0x402d2f18 in MODULE_redhatppp::domenu ()
from /usr/lib/linuxconf/modules/redhatppp.so.1.17.2
No symbol table info available.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 66442-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2000 01:06:19 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Fri Dec 01 19:06:19 2000
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 142187-0002Jn-00; Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:06:19 -0600
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([62.253.132.107]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <20001202010616.NDKC3796.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@riva.ucam.org>;
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:06:16 +0000
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 1421Ex-00005a-00; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:13:23 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
To: 58418-done@bugs.debian.org, 64287-done@bugs.debian.org,
65769-done@bugs.debian.org, 66060-done@bugs.debian.org,
66442-done@bugs.debian.org, 67257-done@bugs.debian.org,
75382-done@bugs.debian.org, 77839-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing spurious bug-buddy reports
Message-ID: <20001202011322.A32181@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Delivered-To: 66442-done@bugs.debian.org
I'm closing a slew of spurious bug-buddy reports, all filed with
reference to Red Hat distributions, containing either no information or
a traceback with no context (and often no symbols). An example follows:
>Package: general
>Severity: normal
>Version: 1.0.51
>
>>Synopsis:
>>Class: sw-bug
>Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
>System: Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686 unknown
Since this is the bug tracking system for a different distribution
(Debian), there's no good reason to leave these bugs open. If you have
further queries, you'll almost certainly want to contact Red Hat, not
us.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: