Re: Proposal for a new package relationship option
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Proposal for a new package relationship option
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Date: 01 Dec 2000 00:40:00 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87r93sprun.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- In-reply-to: <87pujcj22k.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- References: <20001125011508.A685@netvision.net.il> <20001125002649.B842@ulysses.dhis.net> <87em0052fb.fsf@nowonder.com> <20001125033038.D32616@ulysses.dhis.net> <878zq84r7p.fsf@nowonder.com> <20001125150757.A283@ulysses.dhis.net> <877l5oigk1.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <877l5o4d16.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <878zq1vmod.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <871yvthify.fsf@becket.becket.net> <87zoihtnil.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <87pujcj22k.fsf@becket.becket.net>
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
Thomas> In the situation you describe, there is no need for
Thomas> Discourages at all. A system administrator is not helped by
Thomas> saying "Discourages" because at the systems administration
Thomas> level, the level of package management, there is nothing
Thomas> inconsistent about the two packages at all.
You have a point there.
manoj
--
I know what "custody" [of the children] means. "Get even." That's
all custody means. Get even with your old lady. Lenny Bruce
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: