On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:44:50PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I'm packaging gtk-xemacs right now. It works quite welll but now I need some > suggestions on how the structure should be. > > The question is. Should I try to make it work like the other xemacs package > and preferably reuse some of it. Or should is that not desriable? It is an emacs, so it needs to work like an emacs. IIRC, gtk-xemacs just has a gtk interface - under the hood, it's identical to xemacs21. What possible justification would there be to make it work differently from xemacs21? -- David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org http://dvdeug.dhis.org As centuries of pulp novels and late-night Christian broadcasting have taught us, anything we don't understand can be used for the purposes of Evil. -- Kenneth Hite, Suppressed Transmissions
Attachment:
pgpOzBjyxC4ov.pgp
Description: PGP signature