Re: new features in dpkg 1.7.1
Previously Joey Hess wrote:
> Not good, and I can't see a good fix, except to make the new version of
> foo also call suidregister in its postinst.
Or make it depend on dpkg >= 1.7.
> dh_shlibdeps has always called it on binaries. Hasn't dpkg-shlibdeps
> always been meant to be used that way?
Yes, but it never was really important until now (and in fact the
text in the policy manual didn't reflect that until recently).
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |