[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sharefont package license sucks, even for non-free

On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Peter S Galbraith wrote:

> I was looking at the sharefont package license because the gimp
> package suggests it.  It starts off with:
> Ok, fair enough.  It's on non-free.
> But then the Debian maintainer wants a cut too! 
> : If you actually pay money for one or more of the fonts in this
> : package then I expect to be cut in. For the work of putting
> : together this package I expect $10 or 10% of the fee paid to the
> : authors of the fonts whichever is higher.
> :                                 
> : Send check to:
> : 
> :         Christoph Lameter, FTS Box 466
> :         Pasadena, CA 91182
> : 
> : Christoph Lameter <clameter@debian.org>, October 6, 1996 
> Perhaps it's a clever idea to discourage the use of non-free,
> but I think it looks very bad to have a package on Debian servers
> that could profit its maintainer simply for packaging it.  It's a
> contradiction in philosophy, especially coming from someone with
> a high profile like Christoph Lameter.
> Should Debian resources be used to make a buck for maintainers?
> Do we need policy against this sort of thing?

Hehehe. It took such a long time for someone to notice.... I really need
to update the address. No checks yet ;-)

If I have to suffer through packaging shareware and the shareware authors
get $$$ from it then I naturally want to be cut in. If its free then I
know what my work will be used in such a way as to be free too and then
its ok also to be beer-free.

Reply to: