Re: RFC: implementation of package pools
Why are you suddenly using a different email address for me?
Previously Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Okay, so can I upload a program that doesn't work at all to unstable?
Yes.
> (When I become a real developer). What happens when that's a very important
> component? I think the "most broken" must have some limit.
Do you really want to me repeat again and again that you don't understand
the concept of unstable? I certainly will not bother anymore.
> I know what package pools are.
So far your remarks indicated otherwise.
> I'm saying that it should be developed with support for testsuites per
> package in mind!
Of course, and in fact that has already been done.
> Testing should be a separate module, I already said that.
Good. Then look at `testing' and discover that it already exists.
> Thanks for the information ;) Didn't I already tell you that I read
> a lot of distributed fs papers and that my area of research was parallel
> programming? You really have no trust in CS grad. students ;)
Of course not, I'm one myself and I see the peopel around me.
> Writing a distributed fs isn't that different for a single machine,
> since when you run it on a single machine it should give decent
> performance.
Performance is really a minor thing in a fs design..
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: