[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#72941: general: non-free packages should have special info in description.

Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> In 5 Oct 2000 14:58:54 GMT Piotr_Roszatycki@internetia.pl (Piotr Roszatycki) 
> cum veritate scripsit :

> > So let we make simple template only with "CD-VENDOR yes/no" field.
> How does one know that the maintainer should know whether it can go
> on a CD, and who would take responsibilities for it if it were "wrong"?
> A CD-Rom vendor needs to check whether a non-free program can go on a CD-Rom,
> and anyway, non-free is there for a reason, and "it's not part of Debian".

True.  So the template could be optional and not dictated by
policy.  e.g. does `libforms0.89' have such a line?  If yes, then
assume the maintainer knows the answer confidently enough to
insert it; if not, either it's unclear or the maintainer simply
didn't put it in, and we must look for ourselves at the copyright
file to find out.



Reply to: