Re: ITP of dotfile

To: Michael Moerz <e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: debian devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: ITP of dotfile
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 20:14:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000927201435.A23194@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.HPX.4.10.10009271650450.8263-100000@stud3.tuwien.ac.at>; from e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:54:45PM +0200
References: <[🔎] Pine.HPX.4.10.10009271650450.8263-100000@stud3.tuwien.ac.at>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:54:45PM +0200, Michael Moerz wrote:
> The last  maintainer of dotfile suggested in TODO to add some automatic
> version extraction of the dotfile-modules that come  from upstream. 

That's me :)

> My question is when the upstream version is autofetched in  debian/rules
> where should I put then the corresponding debian-version? should that go
> into a seperate  file or should that simply be in a variable in
> debian/rules ?

A variable in debian/rules... but I doubt you'll make it work in the end.
It has a few exceptions, IIRC.

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply to:

References:
- ITP of dotfile
  - From: Michael Moerz <e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at>

Prev by Date: Pre-ITP: nhc98, hmake, hat, HOOD / License issue
Next by Date: Problem w/ console-apt installing from CD-ROM
Previous by thread: ITP of dotfile
Next by thread: Re: ITP of dotfile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread