Re: Intent To Split: netbase
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Intent To Split: netbase
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 20 Sep 2000 13:42:47 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] u1hvgvrrmco.fsf@contents-vnder-pressvre.mit.edu>
- In-reply-to: Manoj Srivastava's message of "14 Aug 2000 10:27:22 -0500"
- References: <200008102352.e7ANqKO17313@gondor.apana.org.au> <200008122342.e7CNgo201776@gondor.apana.org.au> <20000813010251.A424@debian.org> <20000813172007.B19275@deadbeast.net> <87bsyv7tid.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> Indeed, a more workable criteria may be to put things in sbin
> that _require_ priviledges (things like mount, fsck, etc), and say
> that sbin contains programs that are useless to the unpriviledged
> user.
This is in fact the intention behind the GNU coding standards
specification, which I wrote. By this definition, traceroute would
certainly belong in /bin.
(However, certainly there is also the caveat that programs should not
switch directories constantly as they gain features, so there will
alawys be a little inconsistence to accomodate historical practice.)
Reply to: