[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE2 - nice demolition job ...

The big package breakups have historically been related to licensing
issues (either a license incompatibility that's been pointed out or a
change in licensing that broke compatibility), so the bug pointing out the
license issue might be seen as forcing the breakup...

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:12:45AM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 10:47:22AM -0700, erik wrote:
> > >  I just can't keep my mouth shut about this any longer and the
> > > unnecassary divisions (read demolitions) of KDE packages are the last
> > > straw
> BTW, what would it take for someone to be forced to break up a package
> or make some other major change? The only thing I can think of that could
> do it is a amendment to policy or something more drastic. (Is this written
> in some document that I need to read?)


You have paid nothing for the preceding, therefore it's worth every penny
you've paid for it: if you did pay for it, might I remind you of the
immortal words of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money?

Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: