Re: RFC: moving packages to project/orphaned
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Regarding the severity of the ftp.debian.org bug: important.
> Rationale: in the general case, packages that managed to get to this
> state are non-interesting (otherwise they would have been adopted
> already). That means it's a non maintained package which noone cares
> about, which in turn means bugreports won't get answered to. IMO,
> they *should* be removed before release. Counter-arguments for the
> general case are welcomed.
Orphaned packages list debian-qa as maintainer. That means all bug reports
go to debian-qa. There are several people that take care of these packages
and try to fix bugs (e.g. the recent security problems in ntop).
When you say these packages are non-interesting: There's noone who wants
to maintain them at the moment. Does this mean that there are no users of
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com