Re: why apt/dpkg not using bzip2
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Thus spake Sergey I. Golod (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 749427 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.bz2
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1024180 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.gz
> > It's about 25% can be saved in download.
> Yeah, but I guess it would take about twice the time to unpack. Please
> don't do that to my poor 486 :-((
But extra size = extra traffic = extra money, that's worse. Unpack no cost at all
(except you time, ofcourse).
p.s. If Debian change default compression to bzip2 in future, we can save about
~20-25% in size of distribution. It especially important to reduce network
traffic in update&upgrade operations.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org