Re: Subpackaging (Was: Potato now stable)
Edward Betts <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> How would it be implemented?
> My recommendation would be one directory per package. Each subpackage could
> just be part of a .tar.gz file. Having the binary dependent parts listed here
> would imply that the package locate could change from looking like this:
> to looking like this:
I thought of another problem. Versions. Are they in the control.tar.gz for
each subpackage? Or is there a small control file in each subpackage that
contains the info?
Another thought. Should signatures be in a single .tar.gz, like I suggested,
or should they be in each .tar.gz
If they are the single .tar.gz, then translators would have to get it updated
when releasing a new version of a translation.
Don't worry -- shop.