WG: ITP: Moscow ML - An implementation of standard ML.
Not For me...
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Annette Schweigardt
AOK BD Heidenheim
Gesundheitszentrum
Daimlerstraße 6
89518 Heidenheim
Tel: (07321) 314 250
Fax: (07321) 314 252
EMail: Annette.Schweigardt@bw.aok.de
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Annette.Schweigardt@BW.AOK.DE [SMTP:Annette.Schweigardt@BW.AOK.DE]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. August 2000 17:37
> An: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: WG: ITP: Moscow ML - An implementation of standard ML.
>
> Not for me...
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Annette Schweigardt
> AOK BD Heidenheim
> Gesundheitszentrum
> Daimlerstraße 6
> 89518 Heidenheim
> Tel: (07321) 314 250
> Fax: (07321) 314 252
> EMail: Annette.Schweigardt@bw.aok.de
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: fevrier@tigreraye.yi.org [SMTP:fevrier@tigreraye.yi.org]
> > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. August 2000 17:02
> > An: Nicolás Lichtmaier
> > Cc: Torsten Landschoff; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> > Betreff: Re: ITP: Moscow ML - An implementation of standard ML.
> >
> > Le 2000-08-16 01:55:59 -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier écrivait :
> > > > > > Don't do that. Moscow ML was my first package when I joined and
> I
> > had
> > > > > > to learn that there are license problems. To be precise it is
> > based on
> > > > > > Caml Light which is not GPLed (read: has further restrictions)
> > therefore
> > > > > > you can't link GPL-code against it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can't distribute binaries of that :((
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you contacted the authors?
> > > >
> > > > I don't quite remember. I think I contacted inria (they hold the
> Caml
> > > > copyright) about changing that but to no extent. I am not sure if
> > changing
> > > > the MoSML license would help - at least it has to go to non-free
> then.
> >
> > > > I did not want to maintain a non-free package at that time so I gave
> > up on
> > > > it.
> > >
> > > The MosML could add to the license: "As an exception to the GNU GPL,
> > you
> > > may distribute this software linked to CAML".
> >
> > As far as I remember, Objective CAML, which is supposed to be
> > an advanced version of CAML light, has been moved to LGPL.
> >
> > But I don't think the CAML light licence has changed.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Philippe Guérard
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: