On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 07:57:39PM -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:25:49AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > I intend to split netbase into a plethora of little packages based on > > > how they're distributed upstream. [...] > > ...and have now done so. > yeah, but i think you should've coordinated better with the > maintainers of all the other packages which used to depend on netbase > (and now should depend on something else). No, everything that formerly depended on netbase should still do so. netbase is not a dummy package. This may change in a little while, but hasn't yet. > making netbase an empty package which can be removed is the goal, > isn't it? No. Making it easier to keep uptodate with upstream, making it easier to support Hurd, and giving away some of the bits of netbase is the goal. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpyVb9VuIC1c.pgp
Description: PGP signature