Re: The fate of libc5

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The fate of libc5
From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:38:11 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 200007131438.KAA17068@mixing.qc.dfo.ca>
In-reply-to: (Your message of Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:17:37 EDT.) <[🔎] 200007131417.KAA16917@mixing.qc.dfo.ca>

I wrote:

> At the prices MathWorks charges for it, you should _demand_ that
> they get up!

*Blush*

I meant to say `that they catch up' (with libc usage).

Reply to:

References:
- Re: The fate of libc5
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>

Prev by Date: emacs20 grave bug: Should be able to fix this in 5 days.
Next by Date: Re: IPv6 adoption
Previous by thread: Re: The fate of libc5
Next by thread: Cheers for Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread