Re: DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)

To: Debian Developers List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:51:02 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000711185102.A2159@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: Debian Developers List <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000711091717.L5182@visi.net>; from bcollins@debian.org on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:17:18AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 20000711091717.L5182@visi.net>

On Jul 11, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:

 >	http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/glibc/
Does it have the fixed iconv(3) implementation needed by the unstable
mutt tree?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

References:
- DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: The fate of libc5
Next by Date: Re: The fate of libc5
Previous by thread: Re: DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)
Next by thread: Re: DOH! (glibc 2.1.91)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread