On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 11:47:58AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > First, why only the public reply? I'm assuming you mean private. Oh, not on purpose, i normally just hit the g key in mutt, would have thought it would send both. I must have hit r instead > > Second, this email was not meant to be taken as my view. I'm trying to prove > a point. If they have physical access, then the machine in question should > not be in the position of being critical to the operation. ahh, ok. I think through the discussion things have been confused. I was arguing with the orrigional thing, about the security arround autofs, and things like that. I would never think somone would use automounting on a machine that is critical, and wasn't really considering this as a valid side of the discussion(physical security arround critical computers). Thats why i tried to make the point about this being a problem with labs, and such. > > [snip] (as I have no problems with what you said) could you fw that to the list? or back to me and i will send it. I meant to send it orrigionaly :) > > ----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- > Version: 3.12 > GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS-- > PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z? > -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > ----BEGIN PGP INFO---- > Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> Finger Print | KeyID > 67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP > AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG > -----END PGP INFO----- > > ps: If you could, would you send your email to -devel, and I will send this as > well? > -- Erik Bernhardson journey@jps.net -- It is better to remain silent and be considered a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. -- Abraham Lincoln
Attachment:
pgp7rAxXjWgwV.pgp
Description: PGP signature