Re: Updating build-essential package list
Jérôme Marant <jerome@idealx.com> wrote:
> As most of packages build with "debhelper", I think that it would be
> logical to find it in the build-essential package list. What do you
> think about it ?
I don't think so. Okay, at the moment(!) many packages use debhelper,
but this may change in the future (it already changed in the past from
debstd). Except this the Build-Dependency on debhelper is a good
hint, that the maintainer didn't forget to add the Build-Depends
header to the control file ;-)
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
* roland@spinnaker.de * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
Reply to: